Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 68599 of 2012
Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Yadav And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Vinod Sinha,Manoj Kumar Dwivedi
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Mrigraj Singh
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 68599 of 2012
Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Yadav And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Vinod Sinha,Manoj Kumar Dwivedi
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Mrigraj Singh
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Petitioners
have approached this Court for issuing writ in the nature of certiorari
quashing the Paragraph No. 10 (2) of the Government Order dated
05.12.2012 which treats all the post of Prasikshu Shikshak into one
category (Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition).
Petitioners submit
that while proceeding to make selection on the post of Prasikshu
Shikshak classification ought to have been made by dividing Prasikshu
Shikshak in two categories i.e. in the category of Arts and in the
category of Science to the extent of 50% each. Petitioners have
submitted division of posts in Arts and Science category are relevant
and there has been classification in the said direction and in view of
this by treating all the posts as one, without any division of the posts
into Arts and Science category the advertisement in question is bad.
In
pith and substance petitioners are questioning the validity of the
policy decision, which has been so taken by the State Government under
Government Order dated 5th December, 2012 wherein the State Government
in its wisdom has not chosen to classify and divide the posts in Arts
and Science category and to the contrary has proceeded to invite
applications from all those candidates, who have passed the B.Ed.
examination and has further passed the TET examination.�
Once the
State Government in its wisdom has chosen not to make any classification
based on Arts category and Science category and has proceeded to make
selection appointment on the post of Prasikshu Shikshak by treating them
into once category, then this Court cannot come to rescue or reprieve
of the petitioners, once same is in the realm of policy decision.
Consequently, writ petition is dismissed.Order Date :- 3.1.2013
Shekhar
Source - Hindustan
8-1-2013
12 comments:
tet supporter paresaan mat ho humari jeet sunischit hai hamara case supreme court me pahuch chuka hai. Aur ek rp goyal advocate k madhayam se pil bhi sc me lag gayi hai jiska base rajsthaan k double bench ka order hai. Order me kaha gaya hai exam se pahle jo rule bane the bharti bhi usi base me hogi. To humari bharti bhi tet merit se hogi. Don't worry be happy yaar chinta gunak wale kare jay tet merit.
umahankar
9058749811
moradabad
, SLP aamtaur par tab hoti hai jab nichli adalat me chal rahe mamle ke kisi paksh ko lagta hai ki HC dwara kuchh cheejo ko andekha kiya gaya hai ya galat kiya gaya hai jis se uske hito par galat prabhav pad raha hai aur aise mamle ke ek ya anek binduo ko SC ke vichararth pesh kar na sirf sambandhit bindu par twarit rahat ki wah mang karta hai, sath hi SC se yah bhi prarthna karta hai ki SLP me ullikhit binduo ke sambandh me jo uchit samjhe, adesh de. Is kaaran se SLP ke mamle me SC dwara diye jane wale adesh ka dayra ek line ke direction ya koi adesh dene se lekar kuchh binduo ka nirnay tak kar dene tak vyapak ho jata hai. Waise bhi SC kee adhikar-kshetra ki vyakhya aur uski vyapakta ka anuman lagana asan nahi hai. Hamare mamle me to ek direction hi HC ke liye bahut hoga aur agar jyada kuchh mil gaya to kahna hi kya?
Tandon ji ke bare me prediction karna, kam se kam main to khud ko is kabil nahi samajhta. Koi bada dhamaka bhi ho sakta hai ya hamesha ki tarah fir se ek gol-mol adesh ka jhunjhuna thamaya ja sakta hai jise hum agli tareekh tak bajate rahe aur Govt manmarji se process chalati rahe. Aadharheen prediction main nahi kar sakta. Aur SC me apna matter Ratnesh bhai ke nam se dakhil SPL me hai,
is yachika me wo sab hai jiske liye hamari ladaai chal rahi hai, TET-merit se chayan, Over-age ka mudda, naye vigyapan ke jariye naye avedankarta judne se pahle ke mukable badhi hui pratispardha, Sarkar ki manmani, Tandon ji ka ajeeb ravaiya, nyay pane aur riktiya bharne me ho rahi deri, sabkuchh shamil hai. abhi ye batana bahut hai, bus prarthna karta hu ki yah prayas parwan chadhe aur safal ho.
TET MERIT SUPORTERS 22 JAN KO APNI AUKAT JAAN JAYENGE
old bharti to cencell ho chuki hai or new bharti cour ka anusar shri tondon ji ko dikhane ke bad ahye hai yee bharti to hokar rahegee.
umadev logo fees ke name per paise mat dhagoo.
bharti to hoo chukhi hai wo bhi acd marit per bas ab to resut anna hai
acd see hi barti hogi
court ne 23 january ki new date di hai.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court View - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
CASE HEARING DATE-09/01/2013
TIME-AT 10.00 A.M. COURT NO.-38
CASE HEARING NO.11 JUDGE-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN TANDON HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH SINHA
WRIT NO. AND PETITIONER-39674/2012 AKHILESH TRIPATHI & OTHERS SIDDHARTH KHARE ASHOK KHARE Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS C.S.C. A.K. YADAV WITH WRIA- 29/2012 SHIV PRAKASH KUSHWAHA S.K. MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS C.S.C. RAJESHWAR SINGH
Post a Comment