BREAKING NEWS

सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश पर शिक्षक भर्ती की तैयारी शुरू ***चुनावी गणित में भावी शिक्षकों पर भी डोरे *** :----

Thursday, 6 September 2012

UPTET - WRITS FAVOURING TO TET MERIT, HEARING ON 11-9-2012

UPTET - टीईटी - TET
 UPTET - WRITS FAVOURING TO TET MERIT, HEARING ON 11-9-2012


Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 41286 of 2012
Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Navin Kumar Sharma,Shashi Nandan
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
When the matter has been taken up Sri Neeraj Upadhyay, learned Standing
counsel has produced before this Court the order passed in Civil Misc. Writ
Petition No. 76039 of 2011 dated 06.08.2021 which reads as follows.;
"An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh by the Secretary, Basic
Education, U.P. Government at Lucknow. Along with affidavit a copy of the Cabinet Decision
as communicated to the Director of Basic Education by the Chief Secretary of the State dated
21st July, 2012 has been brought on record.
Sri C.B. Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General informs the Court that necessary
amendments in the Rules in terms of the Cabinet Decision is still to be taken.
Sri Ashok Khare learned Senior Advocate points out that a writ petition has already been filed
challenging the Cabinet Decision as notified under the order dated 21st July, 2012.
Let the State make necessary amendments, as desired, in the statutory rules regulating the
appointment of assistant teachers in Parishidiya Vidyalayas by 25th August, 2012.
Such direction is being issued by the Court only because appointment on the post of assistant
teachers in Parishidiya Vidyalayas is held-up since last so many years, initially because of
proper advertisement being not published and then a serious dispute in respect of Teachers
Eligibility Test Examination held by the State Government has been arisen.
This Court must resolve the issue so that suitable teachers may be appointed in Parishidiya
Vidyalayas, where there are acute shortage of qualified teachers.
This Court may clarify that no opinion is being expressed by the Court on the Cabinet decision
taken by the State Government. It is for the State to examine all aspects of the matter before
making any amendments in the Rules, however, whatever is required to be done must be done
by the next date.
In the affidavit to be filed by the State on the next date, query made under the order of the
Court dated 25th May, 2012 must also be answered.
List this matter on 27th August, 2012. Interim order granted earlier by this Court shall continue
in operation till the next date fixed. "
Issue raised in present writ petition is the issue which is already engaging the
attention of that particular Bench, in view of this it would be much more
appropriate that record of present writ petition be also placed alongwith the
record of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 76039 of 2011 on the date fixed in the
aforesaid writ petition. The said matter, it has been informed has been
nominated to Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Tandon. Let requisite orders be
obtained by the Acting Chief Justice.
In the meantime learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, in case so desire
he may file counter affidavit in the present writ petition
Order Date :- 23.8.2012
Dhruv




Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 40323 of 2012
Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Pathak & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- V.K. Singh,G.K. Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
List this writ petition alongwith record of Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 on
the date fixed in the aforementioned writ petititon.
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 21.8.2012



Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43114 of 2012
Petitioner :- Rama Tripathi & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Santosh Kumar Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
When the matter has been taken up Sri Neeraj Upadhyay, learned Standing counsel
has produced before this Court the order passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.
76039 of 2011 dated 06.08.2021 which reads as follows.;
"An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh by the Secretary,
Basic Education, U.P. Government at Lucknow. Along with affidavit a copy of the
Cabinet Decision as communicated to the Director of Basic Education by the Chief
Secretary of the State dated 21st July, 2012 has been brought on record.
Sri C.B. Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General informs the Court that
necessary amendments in the Rules in terms of the Cabinet Decision is still to be
taken.
Sri Ashok Khare learned Senior Advocate points out that a writ petition has already
been filed challenging the Cabinet Decision as notified under the order dated 21st
July, 2012.
Let the State make necessary amendments, as desired, in the statutory rules
regulating the appointment of assistant teachers in Parishidiya Vidyalayas by 25th
August, 2012.
Such direction is being issued by the Court only because appointment on the post of
assistant teachers in Parishidiya Vidyalayas is held-up since last so many years,
initially because of proper advertisement being not published and then a serious
dispute in respect of Teachers Eligibility Test Examination held by the State
Government has been arisen.
This Court must resolve the issue so that suitable teachers may be appointed in
Parishidiya Vidyalayas, where there are acute shortage of qualified teachers.
This Court may clarify that no opinion is being expressed by the Court on the Cabinet
decision taken by the State Government. It is for the State to examine all aspects of
the matter before making any amendments in the Rules, however, whatever is
required to be done must be done by the next date.
In the affidavit to be filed by the State on the next date, query made under the order
of the Court dated 25th May, 2012 must also be answered.
List this matter on 27th August, 2012. Interim order granted earlier by this Court shall
continue in operation till the next date fixed. "
Issue raised in present writ petition is the issue which is already engaging the
attention of that particular Bench, in view of this it would be much more appropriate
that record of present writ petition be also placed alongwith the record of Civil Misc.
Writ Petition No. 76039 of 2011 on the date fixed in the aforesaid writ petition. The
said matter, it has been informed has been nominated to Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun
Tandon. Let requisite orders be obtained by the Acting Chief Justice.
In the meantime learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, in case so desire he
may file counter affidavit in the present writ petition

Order Date :- 29.8.2012/T.S.

12 comments:

Blog Editor said...

Use Chat Box for instant answering
1-click on + in chat box
2-register your user name and password
3-type message and press ENTER.

M.K.Sharma,Mathura said...

SBTC-2007 Badaun Distt. Merit list

Gen Male ART-244.61,sci-244.49,

Gen Female Art-247.04,Sci-236.03,

obc Male art-237.85,Sci-235.24,

OBC Female Art-234.73,sci-207.26,

Sc Male Art-224.50,sci-211.72,

Sc Female Art-212.75,sci-194.36,

ST Male Art-209.21,Sci-199.30

Ramu Kumar said...

lo pad gyi tet ki rit ab karwa lo bharti

Ramu Kumar said...

sab rakha rah jyga iss drame me kisi ki job na lagne denge hamre honble cm, judje and tet friend

M.K.Sharma,Mathura said...

SBTC 2007 Bulandshahar

Candidate Name- Ashok Kr. Sharma
Father's Name-Ramhet
D.O.B-08-08-1969
Total Mark-187.70
Name of Training-B.ed
Passing Year-1991
College-AK PG College Shikohabad

Ye hi last candidate tha General Cat. ka selection main.

yaspal singh kasana said...

Kuch nahi hoga en rit se sabhi rit ek sath kharij hongi

Ramesh verma said...

Yashpal ji is mahabhrist up sarkar ke sath ek aur bhi cheej hai jise court kahte hai us par bharosa abhi baki hai.

D.K said...

dekho hathini mayawati ko kaise vote bank ki khatir haat pair maar rahi h. Is saali ne jab bharti nikali thi to kya ye bachcho ke favour me kuch nahi bol sakti thi kya. Is mayawati kamini ko chahiye tha ki opposite party leader ki tarah oppose kartit or bachcho ke bhavishya ke baare me sochkar unke saath khadi hoti.
Is lalchi budhiya ka to bas paisa dikhta h. Paisa kamane or vote ki khatir hi isne election time par bharti nikali taki isko chunavi fayda mil sake.
Kudrat ki maar bahut buri hoti h yaaro. Yadi koi kisi k saath bura karta uske saath kudrat insaaf karti h.
Mayawati ne btc4, vbtc7v8 walo k sath itna bura kiya tha ki isne unki nokri cheen li or vo bechare itne saalo se training karne ke baad b ghar baithe h.kai to bechare nokri ki aas me apni jindgi se b khel gaye.
Kudrat ne b iske maya kamini k saath nyay kiya saali aise gayi jaise gadhe ke sar se seeng.
Ab b mere tetian dosto jara thande dimag se socho ye sab kiya dhara is maya ka hi h.isne maya kamane k chakkar me pehle se chale aa rahi niyamabali me chedchad ki.

UPTET 2011 NEWS said...

I agree DK

RAJVEER SINGH CHAUHAN :J.P.NAGAR AMROHA said...

writ se kuch nahi hoga 11 ko court add.cancel kr degi to writ ko salo apni ma ki bhosdi me dal dena.

in bhosdi walo se pucho ki jab nokri hi nahi rahagi to in writo ka kya matlab.

ye kami or rh gae thi wo bhi puri kr lo.

RAJVEER SINGH CHAUHAN :J.P.NAGAR AMROHA said...

writ se kuch nahi hoga 11 ko court add.cancel kr degi to writ ko salo apni ma ki bhosdi me dal dena.

in bhosdi walo se pucho ki jab nokri hi nahi rahagi to in writo ka kya matlab.

ye kami or rh gae thi wo bhi puri kr lo.

D.K said...

ye writ dalne wale vo log h jo ki bechare tetians ko behkakar k unse case karne k nam par paisa aith rahe h or apni jebo ko full kar rahe h. In logo ne to ye dhandha bana liya h jisse inka chulha jalta rahe or dusro ke chulho ko ye fodte rahe.